文章摘要
纤维支气管镜检查的临床护理方法及效果
Clinical nursing methods and effects of fiberoptic bronchoscopy
  
DOI:
中文关键词: 纤维支气管镜  优质护理  负面情绪
英文关键词: Fiberoptic bronchoscopy  High-quality nursing  Negative emotion
基金项目:
作者单位
印华平 南京鼓楼医院集团宿迁市人民医院 
摘要点击次数: 38
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的:分析纤维支气管镜检查的临床护理方法及效果。方法:收集2019年1月到2019年7月在本院接受治疗且留存有完整医疗数据的65例纤维支气管镜检查患者,将患者统一编号后取随机数字后分为对照组(n=30)与观察组(n=35),其中对照组给予常规护理模式,观察组给予优质护理模式,观察两组护理干预前后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)变化。结果:护理前两组患者的VAS评分无统计学差异(P>0.05),护理后两组患者VAS评分均降低,且观察组评分低于对照组(P<0.05);护理前两组SAS、SDS评分无统计学差异(P>0.05),干预后两组均降低,且观察组低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:纤维支气管镜检查中实施优质护理干预措施,能够降低患者的疼痛感并改善患者的负面情绪,在临床可以作为优势方法推荐。
英文摘要:
      Objective: To analyze the clinical nursing methods and effects of fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Methods: From January 2019 to July 2019, 65 patients underwent fiberoptic bronchoscopy in our hospital with complete medical data were collected and divided into control group (n=30) and observation group (n=35). The observation group was given routine nursing mode, while the observation group was given high-quality nursing mode. The changes of visual analogue scale (VAS), self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) before and after nursing intervention were observed. Results: There was no significant difference in VAS score between the two groups before nursing (P > 0.05). After nursing, VAS score of both groups decreased, and the score of observation group was lower than that of control group(P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in SAS and SDS scores between the two groups before nursing (P > 0.05). After intervention, the SAS and SDS scores of the two groups were decreased, and the SAS and SDS scores of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Implementing high-quality nursing intervention measures in fiberoptic bronchoscopy can reduce pain and improve patients' negative emotions. It can be recommended as an advantageous method in clinical practice.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

扫码关注本刊微信公众号“健康动向”