文章摘要
二元应对干预对妊娠期糖尿病孕妇及其配偶心理状态及生活质量的影响研究
投稿时间:2025-07-29  修订日期:2025-07-29
中文关键词: 二元应对干预  妊娠期糖尿病  配偶  心理状态  生活质量
英文关键词: Dyadic coping intervention  Gestational diabetes mellitus  A spouse  Mental state  Quality of life
作者单位地址
张素春* 广州医科大学附属妇女儿童医疗中心增城院区 广东省广州市增城区荔湖街道增城大道293号
蔡惠棉 广州医科大学附属妇女儿童医疗中心增城院区 
吕惠婵 广州医科大学附属妇女儿童医疗中心增城院区 
摘要点击次数: 6
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的 分析二元应对干预对妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)孕妇及其配偶心理状态及生活质量的影响。方法 选取广州医科大学附属妇女儿童医疗中心增城院区2024年1月到2024年12月收治的88例GDM孕妇为研究对象。根据护理方案的差异分为观察组(n=46)和对照组(n=42)。对照组给予常规护理方案干预,观察组给予二元应对干预。比较两组孕妇干预前、干预4个月后的血糖[空腹血糖(FPG)、餐后2小时血糖(2hPG)]、知信行问卷得分、心理状态[焦虑自评表(SAS评分)、抑郁自评表(SDS)]、生活质量[世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表简表(WHOQOL-BREF)]。比较孕妇配偶干预前、干预4个月后的心理状态[焦虑自评表(SAS评分)、抑郁自评表(SDS)]及生活质量[世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表简表(WHOQOL-BREF)]。结果 两组孕妇干预后4个月的FPG、2hPG均比干预前下降,且观察组低于对照组(P<0.05)。两组孕妇干预4个月后的知信行问卷得分、WHOQOL-BREF得分比干预前升高,且观察组高于对照组(P<0.05)。两组孕妇及其配偶干预4个月的SAS、SDS得分均比干预前下降,且观察组低于对照组(P<0.05)。两组孕妇配偶干预4个月的WHOQOL-BREF得分均比干预前升高,且观察组高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 二元应对干预可改善GDM孕妇及其配偶的心理状态和生活质量,提升孕妇健康知信行水平,并有效控制血糖。
英文摘要:
      Objective To analyze the effect of dyadic coping intervention on the psychological status and quality of life of pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus and their spouses. Methods A total of 88 pregnant women with GDM admitted to the Women and Children's Medical Center of Guangzhou Medical University from January 2024 to December 2024 were selected as the research objects. According to the differences in nursing programs, they were divided into the observation group (n=46) and the control group (n=42). The control group was given routine nursing intervention, and the observation group was given dyadic coping intervention. The blood glucose [fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (2hPG)], knowledge, attitude and practice questionnaire scores, mental state [self-rating anxiety scale (SAS score), self-rating depression scale (SDS)], and quality of life [World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF)] were compared between the two groups of pregnant women before intervention and 4 months after intervention. The psychological state [self-rating anxiety scale (SAS score), self-rating depression scale (SDS)] and quality of life [World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF)] of spouses of pregnant women before intervention and 4 months after intervention were compared. Results The FPG and 2hPG of pregnant women in the two groups 4 months after intervention were lower than those before intervention, and the observation group was lower than the control group (P<0.05). After 4 months of intervention, the scores of knowledge, attitude and practice questionnaire and WHOQOL-BREF of pregnant women in the two groups were higher than those before intervention, and those in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The SAS and SDS scores of pregnant women and their spouses in the two groups 4 months after intervention were lower than those before intervention, and those in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The WHOQOL-BREF scores of the spouses of pregnant women in the two groups 4 months after intervention were higher than those before intervention, and the scores of the observation group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusions Dyation-based coping can improve the psychological status and quality of life of GDM pregnant women and their spouses, improve the level of health knowledge, attitude and practice of pregnant women, and effectively control blood glucose
View Fulltext   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭