文章摘要
孕期保健措施联合量化健康教育在妊娠期糖尿病中的应用及对妊娠结局的影响
Application of pregnancy health care measures combined with quantitative health education in diabetes during pregnancy and its impact on pregnancy outcome
投稿时间:2025-04-01  修订日期:2025-04-01
中文关键词: 孕期保健措施  量化健康教育  妊娠期糖尿病  产妇  妊娠结局
英文关键词: Pregnancy care measures  Quantitative health education  Gestational diabetes  Postpartum women  pregnancy outcome
作者单位邮编
张染* 徐州市妇幼保健院 产科 
江苏徐州 
 
221000 
221000
摘要点击次数: 3
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      【摘要】目的:观察孕期保健措施联合量化健康教育在妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)护理中对血糖水平及产妇分娩情况的改善作用。方法:选取本院2023年1月~2024年2月的140例GDM患者,随机数表法随机分为2组。常规组70例实施常规护理,干预组70例实施孕期保健措施联合量化健康教育,对比2组的血糖水平、健康教育知识得分、治疗依从性、自我管理行为、分娩方式、不良妊娠结局、婴儿不良结局。结果:干预组干预后血糖水平各指标低于常规组,P<0.05。干预组干预后的健康教育知识与治疗依从性的得分高于常规组,P<0.05。干预组干预后自我管理行为得分高于常规组,P<0.05。干预组顺产率高于常规组,P<0.05。干预组不良妊娠结局发生率(5.71%、4.29%)与婴儿不良结局发生率低于常规组(14.29%、12.86%),x2=4.731、4.256,P=0.040、0.046。结论:孕期保健措施联合量化健康教育在GDM护理中的实施效果显著,可降低血糖,提高健康知识水平、治疗依从性以及自我管理能力,降低剖宫产、不良妊娠结局以及婴儿不良结局的发生率,值得推行。
英文摘要:
      Objective: To explore the influence of pregnancy health care measures and quantitative health education on blood sugar level and pregnant women"s pregnancy outcome in the nursing of diabetes mellitus (GDM) in pregnancy. Method: 140 patients with GDM from January 2023 to February 2024 in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups using a random number table method. 70 cases in the routine group received routine nursing care, while 70 cases in the intervention group received pregnancy care measures combined with quantitative health education. The blood glucose levels, health education knowledge scores, treatment compliance, self-management behavior, delivery methods, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and infant adverse outcomes were compared between the two groups. Result: After intervention, the blood glucose levels in the intervention group were lower than those in the control group, P<0.05. The health education knowledge score and treatment compliance score of the intervention group were higher than those of the conventional group after intervention, P<0.05. The self-management behavior score of the intervention group was higher than that of the control group after intervention, P<0.05. The intervention group had a higher vaginal delivery rate than the control group, P<0.05. The incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes (5.71%, 4.29%) and infant adverse outcomes in the intervention group were lower than those in the control group (14.29%, 12.86%), with x 2=4.731, 4.256, P=0.040, 0.046. Conclusion: The implementation of pregnancy care measures combined with quantitative health education in GDM nursing has a significant effect, which can reduce patients" blood sugar levels, improve their health knowledge level, treatment compliance, and self-management ability, reduce the incidence of cesarean section, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and infant adverse outcomes. It is worth promoting.
View Fulltext   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭