文章摘要
不同手术切口对浸润性乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检成功率及术后恢复的差异性分析
Analysis of the difference in the success rate and postoperative recovery of sentinel lymph node biopsy for invasive breast cancer with different surgical incisions
投稿时间:2024-07-08  修订日期:2024-07-08
中文关键词: 浸润性乳腺癌  前哨淋巴结活检  乳房至腋窝横行单切口  并发症  上肢功能恢复
英文关键词: Invasive breast cancer  Sentinel lymph node biopsy  Horizontal single incision from breast to armpit  complication  Upper limb function recovery
作者单位邮编
刘时征* 山东省巨野县人民医院 274900
摘要点击次数: 6
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的:探究浸润性乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检中,不同手术切口对成功率、术后恢复所产生的差异性影响。方法:观察时段2021年1月~2023年10月,研究对象上述时段入院浸润性乳腺癌患者66例,分组模式为切口方式差异性,均设定33例,包括:对照组-乳房与腋窝横之间开展的双切口操作,观察组-乳房与腋窝横之间开展的单切口操作,由前哨淋巴结检出率、并发症风险、术后上肢功能恢复情况等维度,开展组间差异分析。结果:经比较,对照组与观察组前哨淋巴结检出率分别为96.67%、93.94%,组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组前哨淋巴结阴性、阳性检出例数为20、11例;对照组阴性、阳性为20、12例。前哨淋巴结阴性:观察组皮下积液发生率为5.00%(1/20),对照组发生率为30.00%(6/20),组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);前哨淋巴结阳性:观察组皮下积液发生率27.27%(3/11),对照组发生率25.00%(3/12),组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术前,组间上臂周径、肩关节活动度、肩关节功能评分指标差异不显著(P>0.05),术后6个月,在上臂周径、肩关节活动度、肩关节功能评分等维度,均为观察组表现更加令人满意,相较于对照组,差异突出(P均<0.05)。结论:浸润性乳腺癌患者行乳房至腋窝横行单切口,可达到有效规避皮下积液等并发症风险的目的,且术后上肢功能得以早期恢复;前哨淋巴结呈阳性时,两种手术切口对术后并发症影响无显著差异。
英文摘要:
      Objective: To explore the different effects of different surgical incisions on the success rate and postoperative recovery in sentinel lymph node biopsy of invasive breast cancer. Methods: The observation period was from January 2021 to October 2023. The study subjects were 66 patients with invasive breast cancer admitted to the hospital during the above period. The grouping mode was the difference of incision methods, and 33 patients were set up, including the control group - the double incision operation between breast and axillary transverse, and the observation group - the single incision operation between breast and axillary transverse. The differences between the groups were analyzed from the sentinel lymph node detection rate, the risk of complications, and the recovery of upper limb function after surgery. Result: After comparison, the detection rates of sentinel lymph nodes in the control group and the observation group were 96.67% and 93.94%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (P>0.05). The observation group had 20 and 11 cases of sentinel lymph node negative and positive detection; There were 20 and 12 cases in the control group who were negative and positive. Sentinel lymph node negative: The incidence of subcutaneous fluid accumulation in the observation group was 5.00% (1/20), while the incidence in the control group was 30.00% (6/20), with a statistically significant difference between the groups (P<0.05); Sentinel lymph node positivity: The incidence of subcutaneous fluid accumulation in the observation group was 27.27% (3/11), while the incidence in the control group was 25.00% (3/12). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (P>0.05). Before surgery, there was no significant difference in the upper arm circumference, shoulder joint range of motion, and shoulder joint function score indicators between the groups (P>0.05). After 6 months of surgery, the observation group performed more satisfactorily in dimensions such as upper arm circumference, shoulder joint range of motion, and shoulder joint function score. Compared with the control group, the differences were prominent (P<0.05). Conclusion: In patients with invasive breast cancer, a single transverse incision from breast to axilla can effectively avoid the risk of complications such as subcutaneous hydrops, and the upper limb function can be recovered early after surgery; When sentinel lymph nodes are positive, there is no significant difference in the impact of the two surgical incisions on postoperative complications.
View Fulltext   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭